Pedagogy-first assessments for educators

Assessments you can stand behind, not just generate.

SayaLab analyzes your material before it writes a question, then independently validates every question against your learning objectives and the right Bloom's level before you ever see it.

Analyzed before generationValidated after generationYou stay the author

30 to 43% of AI-generated questions need rewriting.
SayaLab validates yours first.

Question 4 of 12Analyze

A company's quarterly revenue rose 12% while its profit margin fell. Which factor best explains both at once?

  • AThe number of customers dropped sharply.
  • BCost of goods sold rose faster than sales.✓ key
  • CThe corporate tax rate was reduced.
  • DPrices were raised across every product.
Bloom
0.92
Objective
0.88
Distractors
0.93
The hard part

Most AI quiz tools skip the hard part.

They go straight from your text to questions, with no check that the material can even support your objectives, and no check that the questions land at the cognitive level they claim. So the questions cluster at recall, the wrong answers are easy to spot, and nothing maps back to what you set out to teach. You catch it in editing, which is why 30 to 43% of AI-generated questions get rewritten, and 23 to 38% carry item-writing flaws in the first place. The tool generated; you did the quality control.

The difference

We do the pedagogy before and after the question.

Before generation

It reads your material first.

SayaLab extracts your learning objectives, maps which Bloom's levels the content can actually support, and flags where the material is too thin to assess. You confirm before a single question is written.

After generation

It validates every question independently.

A separate pass re-classifies each question's Bloom's level blind, verifies its alignment to your objective, scores its distractors for plausibility, and traces its answer back to your source. Weak questions regenerate automatically.

Bloom's level isn't a setting you pick. It's the evidence we verify on every question.

How it works

Four steps, and you are in control at each one.

Upload

PDF, DOCX, PPTX, text, or a lecture image. Your syllabus, slides, notes, or a photo of the board.

Analyze

Objectives, the Bloom's ceiling the content supports, and content sufficiency, surfaced for your review.

Generate

To your targets: question types, Bloom's distribution, and the objectives you set.

Validate

Every question checked for cognitive level, objective alignment, distractor quality, source alignment, and clarity.

Sample assessment

This is what "validated" looks like.

Every question ships with its evidence: the objective it measures, the Bloom's level we verified, and how plausible its distractors are.

Question 4 of 12Analyze

A company's quarterly revenue rose 12% while its profit margin fell. Which factor best explains both at once?

  • AThe number of customers dropped sharply.
  • BCost of goods sold rose faster than sales.✓ key
  • CThe corporate tax rate was reduced.
  • DPrices were raised across every product.
Bloom
0.92
Objective
0.88
Distractors
0.93
Matches your objectives and Bloom's level. It measures what you set out to teach, at the right thinking level.
Believable wrong answers. Each one is a mistake students actually make.
Comes from your material. The right answer traces back to what you uploaded.
Bloom's distribution, this assessment
RememberUnderstandApplyAnalyzeEvaluateCreate

No tool that names "experts" actually shows you the check. SayaLab does: the evidence travels with every question.

Who it's for

Built for educators who have to stand behind the assessment.

University lecturers

Exams you can stand behind.

Aligned to your course objectives, defensible at the cognitive level you claim, in a fraction of the time.

For higher education
Instructional designers

Constructive alignment, at scale.

Objectives, activities, and assessment that actually line up, validated across a whole curriculum, not one quiz.

For instructional designers
Corporate L&D

Competency-aligned, trusted.

Assessments mapped to the competencies your stakeholders signed off on, with the evidence to show it.

For corporate training
Why you can trust the output

Trust the method, not the marketing.

How we validate

AI questions skew to recall, measurably weaker at higher Bloom's levels.PLOS ONE 2024 · BMC 2025
Distractors are often implausible, the most common item-writing flaw.PMC 2025
Done right, validated AI assessments can match human-authored quality.Nature npj 2026 · Stanford 2025
Pricing

Simple pricing. Start free.

Free
$0
forever
  • 30 questions / 30-day cycle
  • Every question type, including essay
  • PDF, CSV, and JSON export
  • Full content analysis and validation
Get started free
Pro Most popular
$20 / mo
or $200 / year

Everything in Free, plus:

  • 300 questions / cycle
  • Annual saves roughly two months plus 20% bonus quota
  • QTI and Google Form export
  • Regenerate any question
Start with Pro

Cancel anytime.

Building on our API? Get in touch.

Generate the assessment. Keep the pedagogy.

Get started free

Free tier, no card required.